In May 2021, Toyota revealed to the world that its new second-generation Mirai fuel-cell car had travelled 1,003km (623 miles) on a single tank — with 9km of range remaining — thus demonstrating the unique selling point of the hydrogen-powered vehicle.

Hydrogen: hype, hope and the hard truths around its role in the energy transition
Will hydrogen be the skeleton key to unlock a carbon-neutral world? Subscribe to Accelerate Hydrogen, powered by Recharge and Upstream, and get the market insight you need for this rapidly evolving global market.

This week, Mercedes revealed that its Vision EQXX battery-powered prototype car had travelled 1,008km on a single charge — with about 140km of range remaining — thus demonstrating that fuel-cell cars should not be boasting about superior range.

Toyota’s 1,000km effort — on a car with an official real-world range of up to 402 miles (647km) — required “an ‘eco-driving’ style but no special techniques that could not be used by everyday drivers”, the company said, but did not say how long the journey made by four different drivers took.

Mercedes’s 1,000km effort — on a vehicle with a claimed real-world range of more than 1,000km — was achieved in eleven-and-a-half hours, on a route across the Swiss Alps that involved roadworks, with an average speed of 87.4km/h (54.3mph).

But perhaps the single most impressive aspect of the Vision EQXX is not its range — after all, there are already several EVs on the market with longer ranges than the Mirai — but its efficiency.

The Toyota Mirai — which has a longer range than its only mass-produced fuel-cell competitor, the Hyundai Nexo — travelled its 1,000km using 5.6kg of hydrogen, a volume that contained 186.6kWh of useable energy. The Mercedes used just 87kWh of electricity on its journey, making it twice as efficient as both its own in-production EVs and Tesla’s long-range Model S.

This means that it would be twice as cheap to run as today’s serially produced EVs.

“Rather than simply increasing the size of the battery, the cross-functional, international team focused on maximising long-distance efficiency,” said Mercedes-Benz. “They pulled out all the stops in drivetrain efficiency, energy density, aerodynamics and lightweight design.”

Yet while Mercedes has no plans for the Vision EQXX to enter commercial production, the company explains: “This new blueprint for automotive engineering has delivered a new benchmark for electric vehicle efficiency and range, and the technology in the Vision EQXX will be deployed in upcoming series-production Mercedes vehicles.”

So if range is no longer a winning argument for fuel-cell cars, what is?

They certainly don’t win on costs — with both the Mirai and Nexo being more expensive to buy than comparable EVs, and three to ten times dearer to run than an electric car charged at home.

And the certainly don’t win on environmental friendliness, with most of the hydrogen available for refueling around the world coming from grey H2 made from unabated natural gas.

“Toyota gives the new Mirai fuel consumption at 0.86kgH2/100km, so running on grey H2 the Mirai emits around 94gCO2/km, whilst the Nexo (1kgH2/100km) emits around 109gCO2/km,” wrote analyst IDTechEx in February. “These figures are only a marginal improvement on the CO2 tailpipe emissions of modern combustion engines.”

The only way that hydrogen cars make any sense — presuming they are powered by green H2 — is that if you cannot charge an electric vehicle at home, it’s a lot faster to fill at a pump than a public EV charging point. For now, at least. Last year, Swiss technology giant ABB unveiled a 360kW charger that it said is “capable of fully charging any electric car in 15 minutes or less”.

“It is a brave government that commits to large public spending to support the purchase of fuel cell vehicles on the promise that one day the fuel will be available to make them low emission... there are substantial production and distribution challenges to overcome to make H2 a cost-effective zero-emission automotive fuel,” said IDTechEx.